Legal Opinion

Amoroso v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1931No. Appeal, 140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, administrator of the estate of Serverio Matteo, sued under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act to recover damages for the death of Matteo, who, plaintiff alleges, was struck by a train of defendant company, and appeals from the refusal of the lower court to take off a compulsory nonsuit.

On the night of December 12, 1926, between midnight and one o’clock, defendant’s passenger train No. 68, traveling east on the eastbound track, struck an automobile at Newman’s Crossing in the Borough of West Newton, the wreckage blocking that track for a considerable time. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MihasSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DriggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Carlo v. Bessemer Lake Erie R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Johnson v. ScandrettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. RodeheaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API