Legal Opinion

Gordon Dempsey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 15, 2009No. 09-1151UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This is Gordon Dempsey’s second visit to this court. The first time around, we concluded that the district court wrongly dismissed, on the merits, part of his suit because review of one of his claims was foreclosed by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Because Dempsey’s suit was largely frivolous, the district court ordered him to pay attorney’s fees, including those associated with the barred claim. Accordingly, we also instructed the district court to recalculate the award to exclude any fees associated with that claim, which the district court has now done. Dempsey, believing the award is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. Clinton S. Parker, Also Known as SpankyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Eunice HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. David H. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. BelangerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Gordon B. Dempsey v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API