Hoyt v. Bunker
Supreme Court of Kansas
B/rror from Reno District Court. Action by Hoyt against Bunker and others, to enjoin defendants from obtaining executions against the stockholders of the Hutchinson Union Stock-Yards Company, and restraining the stockholders from paying the executions till plaintiff’s and defendants’ rights and priorities are finally determined. A demurrer to the petition was sustained, and plaintiff brings error. The opinion, filed Jauuary 7, 1893, states the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
This was a proceeding by injunction, to restrain L. A. Bunker, the Valley State Bank, the National Bank of Commerce, and W. F. Mulkey as assignee, and the First National Bank, from obtaining executions and proceeding against A. J. Lusk, J. F. Greenlee, E. S. Handy, W. E. Hutchinson, and L. C. Welt on, stockholders in the Hutchinson Union Stock-Yards Company, and to restrain the said stockholders from paying to said defendants the several sums claimed by them against said stock-yards company until the rights and priorities of the plaintiff and the defendants seeking said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Hentig v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Atkinson v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
- Valley Bank & Savings Institution v. Ladies' Congregational Sewing SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- M. D. Wells & Co. v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ferguson v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sleeper v. NorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- McVickar v. JonesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1895
- Sedgwick City Bank v. Sedgwick Milling and Elevator, Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Delaware · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.