Miserendino, Krull & Foley v. Crump
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum. Denman, J., not participating. Memorandum: The defendant contends that it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term to refuse to accept an admittedly untimely response to a notice to admit duly served pursuant to CPLR 3123 (subd [a]). He also asserts that there are triable issues of fact which preclude the entry of summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 (subd [b]). Special Term granted summary judgment on the three causes of action alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strychalski v. MekusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Carlson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Walski v. FormaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- M & S Mercury Air Conditioning Corp. v. RodolitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Gorin Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- T. J. Picozzi Construction Co. v. Exchange Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Ross v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 2009