Legal Opinion

Miserendino, Krull & Foley v. Crump

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum. Denman, J., not participating. Memorandum: The defendant contends that it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term to refuse to accept an admittedly untimely response to a notice to admit duly served pursuant to CPLR 3123 (subd [a]). He also asserts that there are triable issues of fact which preclude the entry of summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 (subd [b]). Special Term granted summary judgment on the three causes of action alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strychalski v. MekusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Carlson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Walski v. FormaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. M & S Mercury Air Conditioning Corp. v. RodolitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Gorin Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. T. J. Picozzi Construction Co. v. Exchange Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Ross v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API