Legal Opinion
T. J. Picozzi Construction Co. v. Exchange Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered October 28, 1986 in Albany County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
The New York State Urban Development Corporation and others commenced an action against Dow Chemical Company, Inc., and Amspec, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Dow) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for damages alleged to have resulted from the use of the product "Sarabond” in several construction projects, including the Kennedy Plaza in the City of Utica, Oneida County. It was alleged in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- George Muhlstock & Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Baumis v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Hanley v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Emery v. Capital Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- La Marche v. Power Test Petroleum Distributors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991