Tarnopolski v. COM, DEPT. OF TRANSP.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentPellegrini, Judge
The majority finds that a third party’s payment of fine and costs which constitutes a conviction of an offense requires the suspension of the charged party’s operating privileges even where:
* the fines and costs were paid without the charged party’s consent or knowledge
* the charged party had “of record” entered a “not guilty” plea
* the magistrate later dismissed the charge upon which PennDOT rules.
I dissent because the initial order certifying conviction is no longer valid when a subsequent certified order is introduced dismissing the charge certified as a conviction in the initial order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eck v. Powermatic HoudailleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- School District of Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- School District v. Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers, Local 400Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Schaeffer v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988