Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tarnopolski v. COM, DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 1991No. 1309 C.D. 1990Published

1DissentPellegrini, Judge

The majority finds that a third party’s payment of fine and costs which constitutes a conviction of an offense requires the suspension of the charged party’s operating privileges even where:

* the fines and costs were paid without the charged party’s consent or knowledge

* the charged party had “of record” entered a “not guilty” plea

* the magistrate later dismissed the charge upon which PennDOT rules.

I dissent because the initial order certifying conviction is no longer valid when a subsequent certified order is introduced dismissing the charge certified as a conviction in the initial order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eck v. Powermatic HoudailleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. School District of Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. School District v. Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers, Local 400Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Schaeffer v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API