Legal Opinion

Hornby v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1983No. 825SC409PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The question raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for Penn at the close of the plaintiffs evidence. In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to *422withstand a motion for directed verdict under Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs evidence must be taken as true and all the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to him, giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference which may legitimately be drawn therefrom, with conflicts, contradictions and inconsistencies being resolved in plaintiffs favor.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Moore v. Adams Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Pennington v. Flame Refractories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Model Mill Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Eastern Shore of Virginia Fire Insurance v. KellamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Thalhimer Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Watson v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Burwell v. Giant Genie Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Hornby v. PENNSYLVANIA NAT. MUT. CAS. INS.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Smith v. Carolina Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API