Legal Opinion
Mona Bronson v. Board of Education of the City School District of Cincinnati, Its Members, Etal.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 30, 1975No. 75--1244PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
The court granted this interlocutory appeal by an order appearing at 512 F.2d 719 to consider the important question of the applicability of the doctrine of res judicata to this school desegregation litigation. In Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education (Deal I), 244 F.Supp. 572, 582 (S.D.Ohio 1965), the district court denied relief upon a finding that the “plaintiffs have failed to establish a deprivation of rights under the law or under the Constitution of the United States . . .” It had been stipulated that the Cincinnati school system included a number of schools…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Westwood Chemical Co., Inc. v. Richard W. Kulick, Arthur Fletcher, and Lenape Chemicals, Inc., Garry B. Curtiss and Joseph Drasner, Movants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. MolpusMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jeanne HARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VANDALIA-BUTLER BOARD OF EDUCATION Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.