Legal Opinion

Lassen v. Curtis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1952No. 31942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

The single question presented is this: Where a decree awarding personal judgment for the balance due on a promissory note and foreclosing a chattel mortgage given to secure the note fails to make specific provision for a deficiency judgment, must the judgment creditor look only to the mortgaged property in satisfying the judgment?

C. J. Lassen gave W. H. Curtis a promissory note in the sum of one thousand dollars, covering the balance due on the purchase price of certain personal property. The note was secured by a chattel mortgage on the purchased property. Lassen later sought to rescind the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co. v. MuzzyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Codd v. Von Der AheWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. W. P. Fuller & Co. v. HullWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. FIRST NAT. BANK ETC. v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Tacoma v. McCaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Robertson v. Club EphrataWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gardner v. First Heritage BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Four-County Electric Power Ass'n v. ClardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API