Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Tarrytown Urban Renewal Agency

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 31, 1972No. 71 Civ. 4243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GURFEIN, District Judge.

This action was originally brought by Mrs. Ollie Barnes against Tarrytown Urban Renewal Agency (TURA), U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and various officials, seeking an injunction to prevent her eviction from her living quarters because of urban relocation requirements. She also sought 1 the convening of a three-judge court to pass on the constitutionality of 42 U.S.C. § 1465(e) and HUD regulation 24 C.F.R. § 41.11(c), which provide that determinations of state agencies or any redetermination by HUD concerning eligibility for relocation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Board of Regents v. New Left Education ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Merle D. Vincent, Jr., Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Battison v. City of Niles, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
  2. Clay v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
  3. Santiago Acevedo v. Soler AquinoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API