State v. Ray
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The defendant, Quentin T. Ray, was convicted, after a trial to the court, of five counts of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b),1 six counts of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a), five counts of sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school or qualifying housing project in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b) and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-267 and 21a-240 (20).2 The defendant appeals3 from his conviction…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009