Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 2009No. SC 17905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J.

The defendant, Quentin T. Ray, was convicted, after a trial to the court, of five counts of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b),1 six counts of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a), five counts of sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school or qualifying housing project in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b) and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-267 and 21a-240 (20).2 The defendant appeals3 from his conviction…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. RaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API