Legal Opinion

Schockett v. Bromley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1952No. 4429_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for leave to intervene.

On July IS, 1951, Harry Sobol, individually, Harry Sobol, doing business as Gross Finance Company, 1 and Harry Sobol, as the liquidating partner of Drive-In Finance Company, a dissolved partnership composed of Harry Sobol and Howard J. Sobol, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy and on that date was duly adjudged a bankrupt. Bromley is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting trustee of the bankrupt.

The trustee brought this action against Harry Sobol, Ohester Sobol, M. B. Sobol, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Demulso Corporation v. Tretolite Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Rowan v. Harburney Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. W. Degge, Louise Degge, Guy G. Goyer, Madeleine Goyer, Howard F. Manning and Margaret J. Manning v. City of Boulder, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. Caparra Gardens Highland Development Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API