Chas Harper v. Richard Brown
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Chas Harper, an Indiana prisoner, seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 claiming that his attorney on direct appeal was constitutionally ineffective because he failed to adequately develop an argument that Harper’s sentence warranted revision under Rule 7(B) of the Indiana Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because the argument was underdeveloped, the state appellate court deemed it waived. The court later rejected Harper’s claim on postcon-viction review that the waiver amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel. Applying the standard announced in Strickland v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cortez Jones v. Victor CallowayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Michael Miller v. Dushan ZateckyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Ward v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
3Cited by25 opinions
- Douglas Hicks v. Randall HeppCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Arthur Bryant v. Richard BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Anderson v. BryantDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- BOLT v. BUTTSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- Blake v. LashbrookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.