Legal Opinion

Vangsness v. Bovill

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1931No. File No. 7044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbeel, J.

On July 26, 1928, plainff and Fannie Bovill entered into a written contract whereby he agreed to sell and she agreed to buy certain realty in the city of Beresford. Mrs. Bovill paid $500 in cash at the time of the execution of the contract and agreed to pay the balance of the purchase price, amounting to $6,800 (or to pay part and give a certain mortgage for the remainder) on August 1, 1928, at which time the contract provided that plaintiff should furnish and deliver to Mrs. Bovill a good and sufficient warranty deed to the premises duly executed, and should also furnish abstract of title…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Attebery v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Heinsen v. LambIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Doran v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Podewitz v. GERING NATIONAL BANKNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Wolken v. WadeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Beresford, South Dakota v. Aetna Insurance Company of Hartford, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. Dail v. VodickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Dail v. VodickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API