Legal Opinion

Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. Tawes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1940No. 9080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

On February 17, 1935, the appellant’s steam vessel Wisconsin was grounded while navigating the Panama Canal in charge of appellee as pilot. The Governor of the Panama Canal, the Panama Canal, and the pilot were sued in the District Court of the Canal Zone to recover the cost of re-floating her, but the Governor and the Panama Canal were held not subject to suit. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. Governor of Panama Canal et al., 5 Cir., 90 F.2d 225. The case went to trial against the pilot only as an action at law for negligence, and the jury found for the defendant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Danzansky v. ZimbolistCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. McBee v. BowmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Royal Finance Co. of California v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  4. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. Governor of the Panama CanalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andros Shipping Co. v. Panama Canal CompanyDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1960
  2. Victorias Milling Co., Inc., as Owners of the M/v Nonsuco v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API