Legal Opinion

Yuval Olivier Minkowski v. BMO Bank N.A.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 18, 2026No. 5:25-cv-06119Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YUVAL OLIVIER MINKOWSKI, Case No. 25-cv-06119-NW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 10 BMO BANK N.A., Re: ECF No. 21 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant BMO Bank N.A.’s (“BMO”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff 14 Yuval Olivier Minkowski’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 15. Plaintiff’s suit 15 alleges that BMO allowed Ms. Minkowski, Plaintiff’s ex-wife, to withdraw $400,000 from the 16 couple’s joint home equity line of credit even after the bank…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API