Legal Opinion

In re the Liquidation of the State Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1937Published

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

Are the items here involved (checks and cashier’s checks drawn on or by the State Bank of Binghamton, here referred to as “ Binghamton Bank ”) entitled to preference under subdivision 2 of section 350-1 of the Negotiable Instruments Law? (All statutory references are to the Negotiable Instruments Law.) This depends on whether the items have been treated as “ dishonored ” under section 350-j. All these items were forwarded by the payees, directly or indirectly, to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (here referred to as “ Federal Reserve ”) for collection. Federal Reserve was, therefore, “…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  5. Rowell v. . JanvrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API