Legal Opinion

De Armond v. Neasmith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oubiam:

Defendants in error brought trover in justice’s court for the conversion of a two-year-old heifer. The only question apparently in dispute between the parties was one of identity, each party claiming to own and -to having raised the heifer.

A witness sworn on the part of the plaintiffs below, after testifying that he had been among Neasmith’s herd of cattle the last two or throe years, was asked: “How were they as to being gentle, coming around you?” This was objected to as immaterial, but was admitted. This, we think, was competent evidence to go to the jury as bearing upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sisson v. Cleveland & Toledo RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Evanston v. GunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Rice v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Priddy v. BoiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Scott v. Astoria RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API