Legal Opinion

United States v. Maurek

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 2015No. Case No. CR-15-129-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1260 ORDER

TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.

Defendant Gregory Maurek has been indicted for receipt, distribution, and possession of child pornography. He moves to suppress all evidence acquired in the search of his computer [Doc. No. 15] on the grounds that (1) law enforcement’s use of the “Torrential Downpour” software program to access files from his computer constituted a warrantless search; and (2) the warrant authorizing the search lacked probable cause because the supporting affidavit neither disclosed the fact that “Torrential Downpour” was only accessible to law enforcement, nor did it…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Roland HoeffenerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. CruzDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  3. United States of America v. Sean FioreDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API