Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for a Judgment as a Mat ter of Law or, alternatively, a New Trial (“JMOL Motion”) (Docket # 191). Plaintiff has filed a response, 2 to which Defendant replied. 3 The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments pertinent to the JMOL Motion are adequately presented in the parties’ papers, and the decision process will not be aided by oral arguments. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. Local R. 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the JMOL Motion be resolved on the briefs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zeno v. Pine Plains Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Wolfe v. Fayetteville, Arkansas School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011