Uggen v. Bazille
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 123 Minn. 97, 143 N. W. 112, the case was retried before Catlin, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of $5,000. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Philip E. Brown, T.
This cause was retried to a jury after a reversal reported in 123 *365Minn. 97, 143 N. W. 112. Plaintiff bad a verdict. Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion.
Tbe nature of tbe action and tbe facts showing tbe general situation are sufficiently stated in tbe reported case. In addition, however, to what is there set out, it appeared on tbe second trial that elevator shaft No. 3 was less than sis feet square; that deceased was directed to work in shaft No. 2 up to tbe time be stepped upon tbe car in shaft No. 3 almost immediately preceding tbe accident;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. International Flax Twine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Gillespie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Small v. Brainerd Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Granrus v. Croxton Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Uggen v. Bazille & PartridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Faris v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Carlson v. BernierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927