Legal Opinion
Hadnot v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided June 24, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00280Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION KIARA HADNOT Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:25-cv-280-RGJ FORD MOTOR COMPANY Defendant * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff Kiara Hadnot (“Hadnot”) moves to remand this action to Jefferson Circuit Court for failure to meet the requirements of diversity jurisdiction. [DE 12]. Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) has not responded and the time to do so has passed. The motion is ripe. For the reasons below, Hadnot’s Motion to Remand [DE 12] is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Initially filed in Jefferson County…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Shirley K. Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Egan v. Premier Scales & SystemsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002
- King v. Household Finance Corp. IIDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.