Brandom v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Director of Revenue (Appellant) appeals from a trial court order setting aside suspension of Respondent’s driving privileges. Appellant contends the trial court erred in that evidence sufficient to support a revocation of Respondent’s privileges for driving while intoxicated was uncontroverted at trial. We agree and order reinstatement of Appellant’s suspension of Respondent’s driving privileges.
Respondent had petitioned for and received a trial de novo after Appellant suspended and later sustained the suspension of his driver’s license, pursuant to §§ 302.500-.540, RSMo 1994. At trial, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Reinert v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Gordon v. DIRECTOR, STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Fitzgerald v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Justice v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kienzle v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- House v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wisdom v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Rhodes v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Roach v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.