Legal Opinion
Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 13, 2016No. CASE NO. C11-2043JLRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs The Institute of Cetacean Research (“the Institute”), Kypdo ; Senpaku Kaisha, Ltd., and Tomoyuki Ogawa’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to dismiss with prejudice three of. Defendants Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (“SSCS”) and Paul Watson’s (collectively, “Defen*1230dants”) four counterclaims.1 (Mot. (Dkt. #304); see also 3d Amended Counter-Complaint (“3ACC”) (Dkt. #297).) Defendants oppose that motion (Resp. (Dkt. #311)), and Plaintiffs have filed a reply memorandum (Reply…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.