Legal Opinion

Fargo v. Hays-Kuehn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 2015No. 111,416PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, J.:

11 We granted certiorari in this matter to determine if facts relevant to the question of primary negligence are in dispute or whether uncontroverted facts result in conflicting inferences. We have carefully reviewed the merits of the summary judgment record in light of the heavy burden imposed on the moving party in a negligence action. Before a court may grant this definitive relief, it must clearly appear that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, viewing the proffered material in the light most favorable to the opposing party.3 Summary judgment is unwarranted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Seitsinger v. Dockum Pontiac Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Malson v. Palmer Broadcasting GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. WATKINS v. CENTRAL STATE GRIFFIN MEMORIAL HOSPITALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Ross v. University of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2016
  4. COOK v. MCGRAW DAVISSON STEWARTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API