Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1888No. 14,147PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case Travis Stewart, defendant below and appellant here, was prosecuted upon affidavit and information for the crime of forgery, as the same is defined in the first part of section 2206, R. S. 1881. Upon his arraignment and plea of not guilty, the issues joined were tried by a jury, and a verdict was returned finding defendant guilty as charged, and assessing his punishment at a fine in the sum of ten dollars, and imprisonment in the State prison for the term of two years. Over his motion for a new trial the court rendered judgment against him in accordance with the verdict.

By his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Trout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Pattee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Shannon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Chandler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Drake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API