Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Pankey

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1988No. Civ. 6315PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Reporter's note: No application for rehearing had been filed in the Court of Civil Appeals. That court, on April 4, 1988, entered the following order: "[A]s a sanction for brief being late, if appellant is not successful on appeal, no rehearing may be accepted."

Appellant, Jack Buchanan, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellee, T.W. Pankey, in a workmen's compensation case.

The record shows that Buchanan was working for T.W. Pankey's commercial dairy as a "general farm laborer" at the time of his accident. His injury occurred while he was repairing a flat tire on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Keeney v. BeasmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Eley v. Brunner-Lay Southern Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Greischar v. St. Mary's CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Holmes v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Russell Coal Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Young v. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. JWM, INC. v. RainesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  4. Early v. DunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Whitworth v. Melvin West/West DairyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API