Legal Opinion
C & T Erectors, Inc. v. Case
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 4, 1985No. 84-2551PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
C & T Erectors, Inc., and Southeastern Fire Insurance Company, an employer and its workers’ compensation carrier, respectively, challenge an equitable distribution order entered by the lower court pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Law, Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, and specifically section 440.39 of that statute. In 1981, during employment with C & T Erectors, Richard Case was injured. He received compensation payments and medical expenses in accordance with Chapter 440. Following the recovery of $300,000.00 in settlement of the action he initiated against the third party…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sullivan v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- National Ben Franklin Ins. Co. v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Lee v. Risk Management, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Sentry Insurance Company v. KeefeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Ramar-Dooley Constr. Co. v. NorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nikula v. Michigan Mut. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Coon v. Continental Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Continental Insurance Co. v. CoonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986