Bridgman v. Curry
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLE, Justice.
The plaintiffs Thomas and Ann Bridgman challenge the post-trial dismissal of their petition for foreclosure of a real estate contract. Because we find that the evidence and applicable law fully warranted entry of a decree of foreclosure, not dismissal of the plaintiffs’ action, we reverse the decision of the trial court and remand the case with directions.
We review de novo this foreclosure proceeding which was filed and tried in equity. Bair v. Estate of Biggins, 356 N.W.2d 551, 556 (Iowa 1984); Iowa Code § 624.4 (1985); Iowa R.App.P. 14(f)(7).
In 1981 plaintiffs sold their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Khabbaz v. SwartzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Olney v. HuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Bailey v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Jensen v. SchreckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Duntz v. Ames Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Olson v. EtheridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Midwest Dredging Co. v. McAninch Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Cooperative Finance Ass'n, Inc. v. GarstDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Carl Gerome Hampton, by His Next Friend, Carl Jerry Hampton, and Carl Jerry Hampton v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Biggins v. ShoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.