Legal Opinion

Lovejoy v. Townsend & Tipton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the County Court of Rockwall. Tried below before Hon. E. D. Foree.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

There is no statment of facts. The judge’s conclusions of fact are: That Townsend & Tipton rented of Lovejoy one of the lower floor storerooms of a two-story rock building for a dry goods business; that Lovejoy, in his contracts with the several tenants of said building, including the one in question, "expressly reserved the exclusive possession, control of, and the obligation to repair and keep in repair” the roof of the building; that the roof became out of repair by reason of Love joy’s negligence during the term of this lease by reason of the margin of the tin roof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. McCardellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1895
  2. Philleo v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. D. H. Overmyer Co. (In Re D. H. Overmyer Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Ross v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Ross v. HanerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Halsell v. ScurrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Oscar v. SackvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API