Legal Opinion

Roseman v. Roseman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1994PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

890 S.W.2d 27 (1994)

Carolyn ROSEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Garry ROSEMAN, Respondent-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson.

November 21, 1994.

Gary Roseman, pro se.

Charles W. Burson, Atty. Gen. and Reporter and Michelle L. Lehmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, for appellant.

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

This case presents an issue heretofore not decided in Tennessee, and it concerns the interpretation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-601 et seq.[1] regarding an income withholding order. We accepted the case in order to determine whether the Juvenile Court of Memphis and Shelby County had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SligerTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. National Gas Distributors, Inc. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Beare Co. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Spence v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992
  5. Belle-Aire Village, Inc. v. GhorleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Win Myint and wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White EagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. In Re Conservatorship of ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API