Legal Opinion

Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & Son

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1990No. 17149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal arises from a dispute between a farmer and a seed producer. The issues are whether the district court correctly (a) ruled that the Uniform Commercial Code was applicable to this case; (b) found that the seed producer had breached an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose under the UCC; (c) determined the extent of the farmer’s damages; and (d) awarded attorney fees to the farmer. For reasons explained below, we affirm the judgment of the district court in all respects except the award of attorney fees.

I

The issues are framed by a convoluted sequence of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Heckman Ranches, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Wing v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & SonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API