Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & Son
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
This appeal arises from a dispute between a farmer and a seed producer. The issues are whether the district court correctly (a) ruled that the Uniform Commercial Code was applicable to this case; (b) found that the seed producer had breached an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose under the UCC; (c) determined the extent of the farmer’s damages; and (d) awarded attorney fees to the farmer. For reasons explained below, we affirm the judgment of the district court in all respects except the award of attorney fees.
I
The issues are framed by a convoluted sequence of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Heckman Ranches, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Wing v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & SonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990