Bingham v. Davis

OSBORNE, Judge.

This is an action for damages alleging faulty construction of a house. The facts were presented to a jury and they returned a verdict for $7097.40.

Appellant alleges two grounds for reversal upon this appeal. 1. The instructions on damages were not sufficiently clear and specific to enable the jury to arrive at a proper verdict. 2. The court improperly defined the duties and obligations of the third party defendant.

We have examined the record and find that no objection was made to these instructions by the defendant in the trial court. CR 51 provides, “No party may assign as…