Legal Opinion

Haas v. Lawson

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1945Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pécora, J.

Plaintiff moves to examine defendant before trial in an action for damages resulting from injuries sustained when plaintiff came into contact with an automobile. As a general rule an examination in this type of case is not permitted unless special circumstances are shown. The court believes that plaintiff, who is a guardian ad litem of the infant who was' injured, has demonstrated the existence of special circumstances requiring a relaxation of the rule. Briefly, those circumstances are that the adult plaintiff has no personal knowledge of the accident, that the infant was only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Kematjian v. Island Cab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Hollander v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. Massaad v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API