Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of DeConza

Essex County Surrogate's Court

Decided March 18, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hartshorne, C. C. J.

This is a contest as to who is entitled to administration of the estate of the decedent, Joseph DeConza, the contestants being Karin Edstrom DeConza, who went through a marriage ceremony with the decedent, six days before he died, in the Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, and decedent’s sister, who claims that such marriage is void, because of decedent’s lack of mental capacity to contract a marriage. The .specific issue is whether or not evidence as to such incapacity is admissible here, the objection being that same amounts to a collateral attack on the marriage, whereas…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RomanoWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In re the Estate of SantolinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Mannaro v. MannaroConnecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API