Legal Opinion

Kevin McKenna and Barbara McKenna v. City of Memphis and William Sarden

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1986No. 84-5608PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which the plaintiffs allege that their due process rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment were violated by the defendants. Kevin McKenna was a Memphis police officer. While pursuing a fleeing suspect on foot McKenna was shot by a fellow Memphis police officer, the defendant Sarden, who was also chasing the suspect.

McKenna charged in his complaint that Sarden “recklessly fired his revolver under circumstances not warrantying [sic] the use of deadly force.” This was so, according to McKenna, because the only offenses known to have been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McKenna v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Loudon CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Timmy Mosier v. Joseph EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  3. Alexander v. Beale Street Blues Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
  4. Beddingfield v. City of Pulaski, Tenn.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987
  5. Rainey Bros. Construction Co. v. Memphis & Shelby County Board of AdjustmentDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API