Legal Opinion

Joseph Friedman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1967No. 18617_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Chief Judge:

Defendant-appellant, Joseph Friedman, was charged by grand jury indictment with having violated 18 U.S.C.A. § 659. 1 Subsequent to indictment and prior to trial appellant moved to suppress certain evidence. After a hearing, the motion was overruled. Thereafter appellant was tried and convicted before a jury and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. This appeal followed.

It is here claimed that error arises from (1) the overruling of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence; (2) prejudicial comment made by the prosecutor in the closing argument; and (3) the giving of a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Sferas (Two Cases). United States v. SkallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  2. Isaacs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. William L. Maxwell v. Dan D. Stephens, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. StoehrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. William C. Drummond v. United States of America, Alphonse Vincent Castaldi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. George LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. DesimoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API