Legal Opinion

Johnson County Plan Commission v. Tinkle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2001No. 41A04-0010-CV-425PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Since 1976, a Johnson County subdivision ordinance has prohibited the division of tracts of ten acres or more into three or more lots. The ordinance was not enforced until 1999 when Charles Tinkle II and Charles Tinkle III ("the Tinkles") submitted their application for plat approval of a subdivision, which was denied. The trial court held that the Johnson County Plan Commission ("the Commission") was collaterally estopped from enforcing the ordinance against the Tinkles. We reverse.

Facts and Procedural History

Although they were aware of a 1976 ordinance that prohibited…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cablevision of Chicago v. Colby Cable Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Board of Zoning Appeals v. LeiszIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hannon v. Metropolitan Development CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Advisory Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Hammond v. Foundation for Comprehensive Mental Health, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown County Indiana v. BooeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. John Counceller v. City of Columbus Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API