Legal Opinion

Allen v. City of Navasota

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1932No. 1366 — 5944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ RYAN, J.

This suit was filed by M. B. Allen against the city of Navasota for damages to his property, situated within and without the city-limits, alleged to have been caused by the-construction by the city, for drainage purposes, of a ditch through plaintiff’s land which; diverted the flood waters from their natural; channel and permitted the ditch to become obstructed so thát the diverted flood waters overflowed plaintiff’s land and injured and destroyed a crop of cotton thereon, then ready for gathering, of the reasonable market value of $1,000, for which judgment was prayed.

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. City of Waco v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Mayor, Aldermen & Inhabitants of Houston v. IsaacksTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. AllbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Terrell v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Cone v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API