Legal Opinion

Dalkon Shield Trust v. Felicia (In re A.H. Robins Co.)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 26, 1995No. 85-01307-RPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

The Daikon Shield Claimants Trust (“Trust”) moves the Court for an Order enforcing the Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization of the A.H. Robins Company (“Plan”) (“Robins”) against Daikon Shield Claimants Judith and Samuel Felicia and their counsel, Michael Pretl and Robert Erwin (collectively, “Respondents”). This Court, which retains the exclusive jurisdiction to address such motions,1 heard argument on July 10,1995.

I

The Felicias are Daikon Shield Claimants with Option 3 claims before the Trust. On March 20, 1992, this Court certified them to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  3. In Re A.H. Robins Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Besag v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  5. Dalkon Shield Trust v. Shear (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API