Legal Opinion

United States v. Beiermann

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided October 31, 2008No. CR 07-4018-MWB, CR 07-2002-MWB, CR 07-2017-MWB, CR 07-4075-MWBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ ACCESS TO COURT’S PSYCHOSEX-UAL ASSESSMENT EXPERT

MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION

A. The Charges And The Guilty Pleas.

1. Defendant Beiermann.

2. Defendant Jacob.

3. Defendant Kashas .

B. Appointment Of The Court’s Expert.

C. The Prosecution’s Request For Access To The Court’s ExpeH.

D. Arguments Of The PaHies.

1. The prosecution’s argument.

2. The defendants’ arguments .

II.LEGAL ANALYSIS.

A. The Statutory Scheme For CouH-Appointed ExpeHs At Sentencing

1. The applicable statutes.

2. Interpretation of the statutes .

B.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BeiermannDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
  2. Vis v. American Family Life Assur. Co. of ColumbusDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
  3. United States v. BaisdenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API