United States v. Beiermann
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ ACCESS TO COURT’S PSYCHOSEX-UAL ASSESSMENT EXPERT
MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.INTRODUCTION
A. The Charges And The Guilty Pleas.
1. Defendant Beiermann.
2. Defendant Jacob.
3. Defendant Kashas .
B. Appointment Of The Court’s Expert.
C. The Prosecution’s Request For Access To The Court’s ExpeH.
D. Arguments Of The PaHies.
1. The prosecution’s argument.
2. The defendants’ arguments .
II.LEGAL ANALYSIS.
A. The Statutory Scheme For CouH-Appointed ExpeHs At Sentencing
1. The applicable statutes.
2. Interpretation of the statutes .
B.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BeiermannDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
- Vis v. American Family Life Assur. Co. of ColumbusDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
- United States v. BaisdenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012