Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Schumacher

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Fayette County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 212. Measure of damage; breach of contract of sale, etc., of goods; case stated. Suit was brought in justice’s court by appellee to recover of appellants damages on account of their failure to deliver to him a car-load of apples, as they had contracted to do. On trial, judgment was rendered for plaintiff in justice’s court for $126.50. Appeal to county court, in which court the case was tried by the court without a jury, and the court found and filed conclusions of fact and law. The court found the facts to be as follows: Plaintiff is a merchant, dealing in groceries,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ullman, Lewis & Co. v. BabcockTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Terrell, Atkins Harvin v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Schleider v. DielmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  3. Clem v. FulghumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. JamisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Gresham v. Tecumseh Oil & Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API