Legal Opinion

Ward v. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 12, 1900PublishedCited by 35 opinions

On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, J.

The declaration alleges that the plaintiff, while driving along a public highway at a point where it was crossed by the defendant’s railroad, was permitted, without warning from the defendant, to drive upon the crossing in the face of an approaching train; that the gates by which the crossing was protected were raised when he drove upon it, but were carelessly and improperly lowered by the defendant’s gate-keeper before he was able to pass entirely over, whereby he was subjected to great danger of being run down and killed by said train; and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Wyman v. LeavittSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
  4. Buchanan v. West Jersey RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  5. Consolidated Traction Co. v. LambertsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Carey v. LovettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Robb v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Frame v. KothariSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Herber v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API