Legal Opinion

Eichenholz v. Brink's Incorporated

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 28, 2019No. 1:16-cv-11786Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ELLIOTT EICHENHOLZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 16-cv-11786-LTS ) BRINK’S INCORPORATED and ) GORDON CAMPBELL ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER March 28, 2019 SOROKIN, J. On February 6, 2019, the Court allowed in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Doc. No. 112. The sole claim to survive summary judgment was Eichenholz’s FMLA retaliation claim insofar as it alleges that the defendants retaliated against him for invoking his FMLA rights by issuing the Performance Improvement Plan (“PIP”) or by lowering his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Nevada Department of Human Resources v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Colburn v. Parker Hannifin/Nichols Portland DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Pagán-Colón v. Walgreens of San Patricio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API