Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Jackson District Court. Replevin, brought by Gardner against Williams and Naylor, for the recovery of a mare and a saddle. Trial at the April Term, 1878, of the district court, and judgment for plaintiff. The defendants bring the case here for review.

1Opinion of the Court

*123The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action of replevin, brought by Peter Gardner against A. H. Williams and J. F. Naylor, for the recovery of a mare and a saddle. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace of Jackson county, where judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendants. The defendants then took the case to the district court on petition in'error, where the judgment of the justice was affirmed; and the defendants in the justice’s court (plaintiffs in error in the district court) now bring the case to this court on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Auld v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Clendenning v. GuiseWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. RossoNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Lewis v. DodsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Swain v. SavageNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API