Legal Opinion

Ernesto Foglino & Co. v. Webster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1926No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

Under the theory of damages adopted by the learned trial court herein, the amount of damages was determined only after evidence had been received from a qualified witness as to the market price c. i. f. Italy during the period of thirty days after April 30, 1920. There is no evidence that such price was quoted in any newspapers or trade journals, nor that there was any method accessible to defendants, who were bankers, by which they could have ascertained the damage plaintiff had sustained, save by consulting experts, whose testimony ultimately would have had to be weighed by a trial court. I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Ernesto Foglino & Co. v. WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ernesto Foglino & Co. v. WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API