Legal Opinion

In re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 30, 1977No. MDL 250PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 22

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This cause is before the court on the motion of plaintiffs’ to compel certain de*418fendants to answer plaintiffs’ interrogatories 6 and 7. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is granted.

The interrogatories at issue are as follows:

INTERROGATORY NO. 6

Describe each meeting attended by any of your officers, agents or employees which was also attended by any officer, agent or employee of any competitor and/or defendant at which there was any discussion, formal or informal, relating to prices, price lists, price quotes, market prices, discounts,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. George Campbell Painting Corp. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. 42 Jars, More or Less, of an Article of Drug Labeled in Part "Bee Royale Capsules". Appeal of Bee Royale, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  5. United States v. 42 JARS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. Casson Construction Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.United States District Court for the District of Arkansas · 1980
  3. In re Shopping Carts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Diaz v. Washington State Migrant CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Abrams v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API