Legal Opinion

Crimmins v. Metropolitan El. Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Thomas Crimmins against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and another for an injunction and damages. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This suit seems to have been prosecuted with the idea that certain facts which ought to have been alleged and proved could be assumed by the court. The complaint alleges the execution of certain leases March 1,1869, by Adam T. Sackett to Thomas and John D. Crimmins, covering certain vacant lots on the southerly side of Sixtieth street, for a period of 21 years, with privileges of renewal for the further period of 21 years each; the erection of buildings thereon by the lessors; an assignment by John D. Crimmins to Thomas Crimmins of his interest therein, and that Sarah E., Clarence, Gertrude…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kernochan v. . N.Y.E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Kearney v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Witmark v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Storms v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Storms v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Raynolds v. Browning, King & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Child v. New York Elevated RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API