State v. Ruiz
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, C. J.
•The defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon, and appeals.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the defendant understandingly and voluntarily made the. confession which was admitted in evidence.
The defendant contends that under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 86 S Ct 1602, 16 L ed 2d 694 (1966), the proceedings surrounding the giving of the confession must show that the party confessing stated himself, after being properly warned, “I have no desire to remain silent, and, also, I do not wish an attorney.”
This contention arises from a statement in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LunacoloradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. NorgrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.