Legal Opinion

State v. Lunacolorado

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 2010No. 080647967; A139805PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*693SCHUMAN, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment for criminal contempt based on his violation of a restraining order. ORS 33.065. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress incriminating statements he made during a police interrogation. Defendant argues that, because of his lack of proficiency in English, he did not understand the Miranda warnings that were administered to him; as a result, he contends, his statements were presumptively involuntary and had to be suppressed under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fifth Amendment to the United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pereida-Alba v. CourseyOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. KamphCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. DerbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Dept. of Human Services v. K. J. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API